ar en fr
Verify a certificate
Verify a Member

Culinary Judging Between Standard and Authority From Personal Taste to Global Professional Responsibility

Reference Introduction

In recent years, the culinary field has witnessed an unprecedented expansion of competitions, programs, and titles. Yet this growth has not always been accompanied by a corresponding maturity in understanding culinary judging as a regulated professional authority.
As a result, personal taste, media opinions, and professional judging are frequently conflated—undermining credibility and eroding trust among professionals and the public alike.

This reference article establishes a clear, authoritative framework for culinary judging as a standards-based professional responsibility—not a personal opinion nor a transient impression.

1. What Is Culinary Judging?

Culinary judging is a neutral, professional evaluation process conducted within an institutional framework and based on:

  • Predefined, written standards,

  • A transparent scoring system,

  • Binding ethical principles, and

  • Recognized organizational authorization.

Any assessment lacking these foundations does not constitute professional judging, regardless of the evaluator’s experience or popularity.

2. The Fundamental Difference Between Taste and Judging

Taste is a legitimate personal experience; judging is a public professional function.

Taste

  • Subjective and variable

  • Non-binding

  • Produces no professional consequence

Judging

  • Standards-based

  • Professionally accountable

  • Produces measurable professional impact

Transferring personal taste into a judging role represents a fundamental breach of professional integrity.

3. Why Judging Requires Regulatory Authority

Judging directly affects:

  • Chefs’ professional trajectories,

  • Institutional reputations,

  • Competition outcomes, and

  • The credibility of titles and certificates.

Regulatory authority exists not to dominate, but to ensure fairness, neutrality, and protection for all stakeholders.

4. Standards as the Core of Judging

There is no judging without standards. A standard is not a general description, but a structured system comprising:

  1. Technical Standard: cooking accuracy, food safety, temperature control.

  2. Sensory Standard: balance, harmony, perception.

  3. Aesthetic Standard: presentation, contrast, visual honesty.

  4. Ethical Standard: identity, authenticity, respect for product and consumer.

A judge who cannot interpret standards lacks the legitimacy to rule.

5. Ethics of Culinary Judging

Ethics are not optional—they are a condition of existence. Core principles include:

  • Absolute impartiality,

  • Disclosure of conflicts of interest,

  • Non-exploitation of title or position,

  • Respect for competitors’ professional dignity.

Judging without ethics devolves into corrupted authority.

6. The Risk of Title Inflation

Unregulated use of titles such as International Judge or Culinary Judge has led to:

  • Public misinformation,

  • Devaluation of legitimate certifications,

  • Confusion among official bodies.

A title without a legal and institutional foundation holds no professional value.

7. Judging as an Independent Discipline

Culinary judging is no longer a mere extension of cooking; it has become:

  • An applied professional science,

  • A distinct training discipline,

  • An academic field in its own right.

This evolution has given rise to structured pathways: diplomas, professional master’s programs, and professional doctorates in judging.

8. The Legal Dimension of Judging

Every judging decision may become:

  • Subject to objection,

  • A matter of dispute,

  • A case for accountability.

Hence, legal and institutional frameworks are essential to protect:

  • The judge,

  • The competitor,

  • The organizing body.

9. Judging and the Chef’s Professional Identity

Sound, professional judging:

  • Elevates standards,

  • Guides development,

  • Preserves culinary identity.

Arbitrary judging, by contrast, suppresses creativity rather than nurturing it.

10. Toward a Disciplined Global Reference

What the profession needs today is not more competitions, but:

  • Clear references,

  • Documented standards,

  • Protected regulatory frameworks.

Here lies the role of serious institutions in clarifying concepts and building a sustainable, responsible judging system.

Reference Conclusion

Culinary judging is not an honorary title,
nor a media privilege,
nor a space for personal impressions.

It is a professional responsibility, a standards-based authority, and a historical trust.
Those who reject standards have no place on a judging panel.

Author: Ahmad Maadarani

Culinary Judging Between Standard and Authority From Personal Taste to Global Professional Responsibility